QA Audit and Consulting

QA audit and consulting for teams with active software delivery.

Independent QA assessment - For CTOs, engineering leaders, and Heads of QA who want an external view of current QA practice before making process, team, or tooling decisions.

  • Independent QA view
  • Practical recommendations
  • Enterprise delivery fit

Request QA assessment

QA audit and consulting for teams with active software delivery 20+ years of experience

Provided by
PLAN A

PLAN A French Tech Sofia label

A Sofia-based enterprise software development and team extension company


A focused review of how QA supports delivery today

PLAN A examines current QA practice, reviews quality risks across process and coverage, and turns findings into practical recommendations for delivery improvement and planning.

Trusted by CTOs and engineering leaders

WacomScaleforceRegateQuontoMolson CoorsJustTradeDGLegacyAPCOAAonAODocs | Cloud Document Management

What this helps unlock

Useful outcomes for delivery leaders

The value lies in turning QA concerns into a structured assessment that supports decisions, planning, and team alignment.

Decision basis

Leadership gets a grounded view for QA investment and delivery planning.

Release confidence

Quality issues are linked to coverage, readiness, and release flow.

Shared priorities

Engineering, QA, and product teams can work from the same improvement agenda.

Action roadmap

The next steps are documented in a form the team can use.

What you receive

Tangible outputs from the assessment

The engagement is structured around review, documentation, and recommendations that help an active team plan its next QA moves.

Audit plan

A defined starting point for the review and the questions it needs to answer.

  • Assessment scope
  • Review objectives
  • Method outline

Current-state review

An external examination of how QA supports product delivery today.

  • QA workflows
  • Test coverage approach
  • Release touchpoints
  • Team collaboration

Audit report

Documented findings that organize QA gaps and risks in a usable format.

  • Observed gaps
  • Severity view
  • Risk notes
  • Delivery impact

Recommendation plan

A practical set of actions to guide the next phase of QA improvement.

  • Prioritized actions
  • Implementation steps
  • Responsibilities
  • Timelines

A practical QA assessment built for software teams that need a reliable basis for improvement planning.

The process stays focused on practical QA decisions for an active delivery environment.

How we work

A simple four-step assessment flow

The work moves from context gathering to documented recommendations without adding unnecessary complexity.

01

Initial discussion

Share the delivery context, QA concerns, and the decisions that matter now.

02

Audit framing

Define the review focus, scope boundaries, and the right stakeholders.

03

Assessment review

Examine current QA practice, documentation, and delivery touchpoints.

04

Findings handover

Review the audit report, the recommendation plan, and the next actions.

Why this makes sense

A relevant starting point when QA decisions carry delivery impact

Built for active delivery

The assessment suits teams with a live product, ongoing releases, and visible quality pain.

Useful before change

It helps leadership evaluate internal improvement, new tooling, or external support with a firmer basis.

Enterprise software context

PLAN A works in enterprise software development and complex project delivery environments.

Advisory-led entry point

The focus stays on diagnosis, recommendations, and planning that can guide the next decision.

It fits teams that need diagnosis first and want recommendations grounded in software delivery reality.

Proof

High-Quality Deliverables and Effective Team Integration

Plan A delivers high-quality products that meet or exceed client expectations. Their attention to detail and ability to provide solutions that enhanced user experience and functionality are noted.

★★★★★

They have deep and expert knowledge from a technical perspective.

“Plan A stood out for their expertise and ability to implement their technical knowledge to provide solutions. Their team was flexible and quick to react to requests for changes; they were also able to do the additional scope within time and budget.”
Nikolay Petkov, General Manager, Joke Trip

Nikolay Petkov General Manager, Joke Trip

★★★★★

Plan A's engagement and willingness to help at all times is really exceptional.

“A supportive partner, Plan A has exceeded the needs of the internal team through their impeccable staff augmentation services. Although the developers are working from another country, they are able to utilize teamwork effectively. They are dedicated, driven, and transparent in the workflow.”
David Gregor, Founding Partner, Denizen

David Gregor Founding Partner, Denizen

★★★★★

Thanks to our close partnership, Plan A’s resources know what we’re looking for, helping them reach our objectives.

“Plan A has grown the client’s team quickly, and their approach to evaluating human skills in candidates is outstanding. The resources are communicative, collaborative, and knowledgeable, and they’ve integrated seamlessly into the existing team, allowing them to deliver fast and with high quality.”
Jean-Baptiste Escoyez, CTO at Regate

Jean-Baptiste Escoyez CTO at Regate

★★★★★

We consider Plan A not just a service provider but a super strong partner fully committed to our success.

“Plan A has delivered the project on time and within budget. The team has been engaged and committed, and the quality of their work has been excellent. The team has understood the client's business needs and priorities. The client has considered the team a strong partner committed to their success.”
Ana Mineva, CEO at DGLegacy®

Ana Mineva CEO at DGLegacy®

FAQ

Common questions about QA audit and consulting

Answers to the scope, fit, and rollout questions most buyers ask early in the conversation.

When is a QA audit the right starting point?

It is a good fit when releases feel uneven, quality issues keep returning, or leadership wants an external view before changing team structure, process, or tooling.

Who is this aimed at?

The main audience is CTOs, engineering leaders, and Heads of QA who already have active software delivery and want a grounded assessment of current QA practice.

What does the assessment look at?

The review focuses on how QA supports delivery, including workflows, test coverage approach, release touchpoints, and quality risks that affect day-to-day execution.

Does it cover manual and automated testing?

Yes. PLAN A positions its QA work across manual and automated practices, with experience in functional, performance, security, and regression testing.

What do we receive at the end?

You receive documented findings in a QA audit report together with practical recommendations and an implementation-oriented action plan.

Is this relevant if we already have an internal QA team?

Yes. The assessment is especially relevant for teams that already operate delivery and want an external review to support improvement decisions.

Do you also take over hands-on testing?

The assessment is advisory-led and ends with findings and recommendations. If execution support is relevant after that, it should be discussed as a separate next step.

Is there a defined entry point?

Yes. PLAN A promotes a free 4-hour QA audit and consulting session as the starting point for the conversation.

Talk to the PLAN A team

Request a first conversation about fit and scope

Share the delivery context, the QA concerns that need review, and the decisions your team is preparing to make.

We will only use this to reply to your request.

What best describes your need?

A few lines are enough, so we can understand how best we can help you.


By submitting this form, you agree to be contacted by PLAN A regarding this service.

Commercial relationship.

This service is offered by PLAN A and featured by French Tech Sofia as part of its ecosystem visibility initiatives.
French Tech Sofia presents and amplifies the offer. The partner company delivers it. Service delivery, pricing, contracting, and execution are handled by the provider unless stated otherwise.